Security is paramount when selecting a micro-payment processing platform. You want to ensure customer personal information and transaction data remains protected. As micro-payments gain adoption, criminals increasingly target these systems. This article benchmarks the core security features of leading micro-payment processors. We will compare Coil, Bitpay, Flooz, SatoshiPay, and Peppercorn on criteria including encryption, authentication, blockchain features, transparency, and customer support. Read on to determine which platform offers the best security protections.

Encryption & data security

Robust encryption secures payment and account data in transit and at rest. All five platforms use SSL/TLS encryption for Internet traffic and restrict internal data access. Coil does not store any customer payment information.  SatoshiPay emphasizes minimal data collection for increased privacy. Bitpay and Peppercorn allow payments via privacy-focused cryptocurrencies like Monero. Overall encryption levels are similar, meeting industry standards.

Identity authentication & authorization

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) with biometrics or codes helps prevent unauthorized account access. Bitpay provides optional MFA but it’s not required. Flooz and Peppercoin currently lack MFA support. In contrast, Coil mandates Google OAuth login tying accounts to a user’s Gmail identity. SatoshiPay has integrated facial recognition login powered by Yoti for robust security. For authentication, SatoshiPay edges ahead of its competitors.

Blockchain security features

Bitpay, SatoshiPay, and Flooz leverage blockchain ledgers to varying degrees for transparency, decentralization, and immutability. SatoshiPay uses the stellar blockchain combined with smart contracts for additional security programming logic. nCoil does not use blockchain technology directly but interacts with crypto wallets. Peppercorn has no blockchain integration currently. For underlying blockchain protections, SatoshiPay and Bitpay excel.
Visit for Additional Details

Transparency & accountability

Publishing security policies, making code auditable, and detailing practices instill confidence. Bitpay’s open-source code enables external validation. SatoshiPay conducts regular audits and discloses business processes. Coil and Peppercorn share comparatively less about their internal security. Flooz is moderately transparent. Bitpay and SatoshiPay’s transparency makes them stand out.

Customer support & incident response

Robust customer service provides assistance when users encounter issues. All platforms offer email support and online resources. Coil provides the most limited options. Bitpay, Peppercoin, and SatoshiPay add phone and chat support.

Flooz also offers a live support bot via Messenger. For user assistance, Bitpay and SatoshiPay again appear superior through varied contact methods. While all micro-payment platforms meet baseline security requirements, SatoshiPay emerges as the leader. Their use of blockchain technology, multi-factor authentication, transparency, and customer support are unmatched.

Bitpay also excels on several fronts like blockchain, transparency, and customer service. Coil lacks advanced authentication but benefits from Google integration. Flooz and Peppercorn lag behind competitors but still offer essential protections. As micro-payments scale, security demands will continue growing. Users should examine provider features closely, as risks are inherent in any financial transaction system. SatoshiPay’s current model provides the blueprint for a robust, trusted platform.